The UK government is at the center of a heated debate over proposed changes to copyright law, which could allow artificial intelligence (AI) models to be trained on copyrighted material without compensation to creators. The is outcry from the creative sector, with high-profile artists warning that such policies could devastate the industry.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle addressed the controversy, stating he would “not have one side forcing me to make a choice between one and other.” He emphasized his commitment to supporting both the AI sector and creative industries while ensuring a balanced approach.
The government recently concluded its public consultation on copyright laws, a move that has drawn fierce criticism from musicians, publishers, and news organizations. Iconic artists, including Sir Elton John, Annie Lennox, Sir Paul McCartney, and Kate Bush, argue that allowing AI to train on copyrighted material without proper compensation equates to intellectual property theft.
The proposals under consideration would permit tech firms to use creative content without obtaining a license, paying royalties, or reimbursing artists. Instead, the burden would be placed on creators to opt out of AI data harvesting — an approach critics say is unfair and impractical.
AI models require vast amounts of data to function effectively. Many already source information from the open web, raising concerns about ethical data usage. Addressing these concerns, Kyle acknowledged the necessity of large datasets for AI advancements but stressed the importance of ensuring creators have the right to protect their work.
The Technology Secretary reiterated that he remains “really open-minded about how we move forward,” but is committed to finding a middle ground.
“We have two fantastic, talented, wealth-creating industries: the creative industries and the AI technology industry. We need to find a way forward.”
Peter Kyle
Kyle highlighted that while his focus has been on the technology side, government colleagues overseeing culture and creative sectors are also engaged in the process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55642/556422b1a3e68fced0e8da46498537c152e0a4b5" alt="UK Debates AI Copyright Law Amid Industry Backlash 2 UK Debates AI Copyright Law Amid Industry Backlash"
Industry Voices Call for Rethink
In response to the consultation’s closure, major UK newspapers staged a protest by wrapping their print editions with messages opposing the government’s stance. Meanwhile, over 1,000 musicians joined forces to release an album of silent tracks as a symbolic demonstration against the proposed AI copyright changes.
Kyle acknowledged that current copyright regulations are outdated in addressing AI-related challenges. He affirmed his goal of ensuring that both the creative and AI industries can “thrive” in the UK.
“We have the second-largest creative arts industry in the world. And I have incredible respect and regard for those people who are creating. I know it’s not just a job, it is a vocation, and people are emotionally attached to it. We as a country celebrate the work that they do.”
Peter Kyle
At the same time, he pointed out that the UK has the third-largest AI market globally. Both sectors, he argued, are vital for the country’s future economic growth, culture, and innovation.
The secretary further highlighted the challenge of enforcing copyright protection, given that “at the moment all of the big models that are harvesting this information, they’re doing it from abroad not in the UK.”
Kyle also noted that AI would be a key topic in discussions between Prime Minister Keir Starmer and U.S. President Donald Trump.
He stressed the importance of the UK and U.S. leading AI development to maintain a competitive edge in the global market. “By the US and the UK working together, we believe that we can stay absolutely clearly ahead of some of the rest of the global competition, and that would deliver benefits for both.”
As the UK navigates the complex landscape of AI and copyright laws, the government faces mounting pressure to craft policies that balance technological innovation with the protection of creative intellectual property. Whether a fair resolution can be achieved remains to be seen.
READ ALSO: Blakk Rasta Slams African Leaders Over Their Choices