In a significant development for Ghana’s energy sector, the government has decided to withdraw a controversial directive issued by the former Energy Minister, which mandated the forced merger of oil fields operated by international companies Eni and Vitol with the Afina-1X field owned by local Ghanaian company, Springfield Exploration and Production Limited.
Bright Simons, Honorary Vice President of the IMANI Centre for Policy and Education, praised the government’s decision, calling it a strategic move that saves the country from further embarrassment.
Simons described the former directive as “bizarre,” highlighting the economic and strategic flaws in the proposal.
The mandate required Springfield to take a 55% stake in the combined field, an allocation that Simons argued was not only impractical but also unjust to other stakeholders involved.
Eni and Vitol had invested over $6 billion in their oil fields, with financial backing from the World Bank to mitigate political risks. In contrast, Springfield’s Afina field had received less than $100 million in investments and was still not proven commercially viable.
Simons questioned the fairness of forcing a merger between these highly disparate fields.
“Merging these two very different fields and giving Springfield 55% would have amounted to a forced transfer of wealth from one private business to another.”
Bright Simons, Honorary Vice President of the IMANI Centre for Policy and Education
He further noted that such a move would also have dilated Ghana’s own stake in its petroleum resources, thereby shortchanging the country.
The directive had sparked widespread concern both locally and internationally, with critics arguing that it would undermine the stability of Ghana’s energy sector.
Eni and Vitol’s fields were significant contributors to Ghana’s oil and gas production, and the forced merger would have jeopardized their investments, potentially leading to a lack of trust in Ghana’s regulatory environment.
Simons pointed out that the previous government’s failure to consult experts or evaluate the broader economic implications of the directive had led to a situation that was detrimental not only to international investors but also to Ghana’s long-term interests.
While the concept of merging oil fields to increase production and optimize resource use is not inherently flawed, the specifics of this particular directive did not align with the principles of fairness, proper investment, or long-term economic stability.
As Simons put it, “The idea was a bit crazy,” stressing the discrepancy in the scale of investments between Springfield and the international companies involved.
A New Strategic Discussion on Local Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79751/79751b3df9edc98af419cf3751fac5e5a8778dc5" alt="Bright Simons Applauds Government for Oil Field Merger Withdrawal 2 Bright Simons, the Honorary Vice President of IMANI-Africa"
With the withdrawal of the order, Simons believes that Ghana now has the opportunity to engage in a more balanced and strategic discussion on local content and ownership in the country’s petroleum sector.
He emphasized that it was essential to support local companies like Springfield in entering the upstream petroleum business, but this support should be both legitimate and sensible.
“What can the government LEGITIMATELY and SENSIBLY do to support local companies like Springfield?”
Bright Simons, Honorary Vice President of the IMANI Centre for Policy and Education
Simons added that such companies will still raise the majority of their capital from international markets, with many likely to sell equity to foreign investors.
The withdrawal of the directive opens the door for a more practical approach to local content policies that balance the need for foreign investment with the desire for local ownership.
As Simons pointed out, the days of pure nationalism in natural resource ownership are behind us.
“There are international rules of capital that cannot be easily discounted.
“Smart countries combine nationalism with international business savvy to advance their interests.”
Bright Simons, Honorary Vice President of the IMANI Centre for Policy and Education
Springfield, which raised its capital for the Afina field from international investors, including brokers from Dubai, Switzerland, and Russia, serves as a clear example of how local companies can engage with global markets.
Despite some challenges, such as reportedly pledging future production output to secure investment, Springfield’s journey underscores the importance of creating an environment that attracts international capital while also empowering local companies to play a more significant role in the country’s energy sector.
Path to Sustainable Growth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/076d3/076d3005aae6383cd84f6aa7ff0817d65ef8da20" alt="Bright Simons Applauds Government for Oil Field Merger Withdrawal 3 ENI-Springfield Unitization"
While the government’s decision to withdraw the directive is a positive step, Simons expressed concern that the protracted dispute had not been in Springfield’s own best interests.
He noted that local business elites, including those in insurance and real estate sectors, had aggressively lobbied the previous government to continue down the same path, despite the potential negative impacts on the broader economy.
These interests, according to Simons, only complicated the situation and prolonged a process that should have been resolved earlier.
“If the previous government had been more receptive to counsel and objective analysis, this mess may not have been created in the first place.”
Bright Simons, Honorary Vice President of the IMANI Centre for Policy and Education
He also mentioned that Springfield might have been able to secure better offers had it not been embroiled in a contentious dispute over the forced merger.
Moving forward, Simons hopes that the government will continue to make decisions based on sound analysis and practical considerations, rather than political pressure or short-term interests.
As the situation unfolds, the next few weeks will be critical for assessing how the government navigates its energy policies and whether it can create an attractive investment climate for both local and international companies.
The withdrawal of the directive represents a clear indication that Ghana’s government is willing to prioritize long-term economic stability over short-term political gains, and Simons hopes this will signal the beginning of a more sustainable and forward-thinking approach to energy policy in Ghana.
REA ALSO: Bright Simons Raises Alarm over Importation of Opioids into Ghana