A recent survey conducted by Global InfoAnalytics has revealed Ghanaians dissatisfaction with the performance of the Appointment Committee, particularly assessing key figures such as the Chairman, the Minority Leader, and the Ranking Member.
The survey sought to measure public satisfaction and determine whether the committee’s work was being perceived as objective or politically motivated.
Speaking on the survey findings, the Executive Director of Global InfoAnalytics, Mussa Dankwah, explained the methodology used and how the results reflect broader political sentiments. The study, which incorporated field and internet polls, surveyed a total of 962 respondents from across the country. Below is an analysis of the survey results and the implications for the political landscape.
The survey sought to gauge overall satisfaction with the Appointment Committee’s work. Respondents were asked whether they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the committee’s performance. According to the results; Overall, 54% of respondents expressed satisfaction with the work of the Appointment Committee. While this number suggests a marginal approval, it does indicate that the public generally perceives the committee’s work positively.
He further explained that the satisfaction rate, though positive, does not indicate overwhelming public approval. He emphasized that while a majority are satisfied, there remains a significant proportion of Ghanaians who are either neutral or dissatisfied.
Key Actors
The survey went beyond general satisfaction to examine the public perception of individual actors within the committee. These key figures included the Chairman of the Committee, the Minority Leader, and the Ranking Member. He stated;
“When you zoom down to the Chairman of the Committee, then his approval drops below that of the Committee about 19% were not satisfied at all with his performance, and 24% said they aren’t satisfied with his performance. So, if you add the 19% plus the 24% then about 43% are not satisfied implicating that about 57% are satisfied.’’
Mussa Dankwah
The survey results suggest that while the committee’s overall work is perceived positively, there are concerns regarding the Chairman’s leadership. One of the most striking findings from the survey was the public perception of Alexander Afenyo-Markin’s performance on the committee. He indicated;
“But when you come to Afenyo-Markin, his is quite different in the sense that, 64% of respondents were not satisfied with his performance, 44% were not satisfied at all with his performance, and 20% were not satisfied. So overall, I think he received the most abysmal scoring from the public with regards to the perceptions of the committee.’’
Mussa Dankwah
The figures suggest that Afenyo-Markin’s approach to the committee has not resonated well with the public, leading to a significant negative perception of his role.
Methodology
To ensure accuracy, Global InfoAnalytics combined different data collection methodologies. Dankwah explained that they conducted a mix of internet and field polls. In total, 507 respondents were interviewed in person across all regions, while 455 responses were collected via internet-based surveys.
This methodology provided a comprehensive overview of public opinion across different demographics and regions. Despite Afenyo-Markin’s low approval ratings in the survey, some social media narratives—especially from known NPP-affiliated pages—suggested strong support for him. Addressing this discrepancy, Dankwah noted;
Meanwhile, on social media, particularly from accounts aligned with the NPP, there appears to be significant praise for Afenyo-Markin. However, the survey results indicate that this does not reflect the broader public perception. He further shifted a focus to explain that elections are won not by partisan support alone, stating; “You don’t win an election from the base. You win from the center; the views of the floating voters are [important].
He pointed out that they haven’t conducted a regional breakdown yet, but preliminary surveys in the Ashanti Region show that the NPP is in decline in terms of party association.
This suggests that the dissatisfaction seen in the national survey might also be reflected in their strongholds. His assertion aligns with recent reports indicating waning support for the ruling party in traditionally strong areas.
The findings of Global InfoAnalytics’ survey present a mixed picture of the Appointment Committee’s work. While the committee itself enjoys a marginally positive approval rating, individual performances, particularly that of Alexander Afenyo-Markin, have been met with widespread public discontent.
The survey highlights the importance of distinguishing between social media narratives and broader public opinion. While NPP-aligned platforms may project Afenyo-Markin as a popular figure, scientific polling suggests otherwise.
In Conclusion, Dankwah emphasized that these perceptions could have broader political implications, particularly in shaping the public’s view of opposition figures and their effectiveness. As the country moves towards future political contests, parties, and leaders will need to address these concerns to maintain public trust.
READ ALSO; Bright Simons Demands Transparency on Pwalugu Dam Termination
