The Member of Parliament (MP) for Mpraeso, Hon. Davis Ansah Opoku, has taken a bold step in challenging a precedent set by former Speaker of Parliament, Prof. Mike Oquaye, regarding the interpretation of Article 97(1)(g) and (h) of the 1992 Constitution.
In a formal petition submitted to the current Speaker, Rt. Hon. Alban Bagbin, the MP has called for a re-examination of the constitutional provisions concerning the vacation of parliamentary seats by MPs intending to contest future elections as independent candidates.
“This matter requires careful examination of the constitutional provisions, relevant case law, including Rt Hon. Prof. Michael Ocquaye, and the Standing Orders of Parliament to fully understand the principles of parliamentary independence, representation, and freedom of association.”
Hon. Davis Ansah Opoku, Member of Parliament (MP) for Mpraeso
The petition raised fundamental questions about parliamentary independence, the freedom of MPs to make political decisions beyond their current terms, and the broader democratic principles governing representation and political pluralism in Ghana.
The Mpraeso MP argued that Prof. Oquaye’s earlier interpretation, which suggested that MPs could face the automatic loss of their seats upon declaring an intention to run as independent candidates, was flawed.
Hon. Opoku’s position emphasizes that such an interpretation runs counter to the Constitution’s protection of parliamentary independence and representation.
At the core of his argument is the principle that MPs are elected by their constituents based on the platform of a political party, but they are not bound to remain loyal to that party beyond a single parliamentary term.
Hon. Opoku contended that the Constitution does not lock MPs into lifelong party allegiance, as this would contradict the fundamental right to freedom of association guaranteed under Article 21(1)(e).
“Democracy requires political evolution, allowing MPs to adapt to changing political landscapes and societal needs.
“Forcing MPs into permanent allegiance beyond a single parliamentary term would stifle political pluralism and diminish their ability to represent their constituents’ best interests in an ever-evolving political environment.”
Hon. Davis Ansah Opoku, Member of Parliament (MP) for Mpraeso
Hon. Opoku’s interpretation, therefore, seeks to strike a balance between safeguarding the integrity of parliamentary representation during a term and allowing MPs the freedom to evolve politically in response to shifting dynamics.
Implications for Parliamentary Independence

The petition raised important questions about the balance between party loyalty and parliamentary independence.
Hon. Opoku argues that upholding a strict interpretation of Article 97(1)(g) and (h) beyond a parliamentary term could weaken the autonomy of MPs and ultimately hinder the effectiveness of Parliament as a whole.
“Adhering to these constitutional principles reinforces the independence of Parliament, safeguards the integrity of representation, and protects the democratic freedoms essential to Ghana’s political system.”
Hon. Davis Ansah Opoku, Member of Parliament (MP) for Mpraeso
He suggested that Parliament should operate as a body where MPs have the freedom to make independent decisions about their political futures once their terms have concluded.
This petition comes in the wake of a similar call made by the Minority Leader, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, who had earlier urged Speaker Bagbin to remove four MPs based on the interpretation of Article 97(1)(g) and (h).
Dr. Ato Forson had cited concerns over MPs’ alleged plans to contest elections as independent candidates, and his request was aimed at ensuring that parliamentary seats are vacated if MPs switch political allegiance during their term.
However, Hon. Opoku’s petition opposes this line of reasoning and cautions against any interpretation that would prematurely remove MPs from their seats.
The petition submitted by Davis Ansah Opoku raised important questions about the balance between party loyalty and individual political freedom within Ghana’s parliamentary system.
His call for a re-examination of the constitutional provisions governing the vacation of parliamentary seats aims to clarify the rights of MPs to pursue their political ambitions while maintaining the stability and integrity of parliamentary representation during their terms.
Speaker Bagbin’s decision on this matter could have significant implications for the future of parliamentary democracy in Ghana.
READ ALSO: Former One Direction Member, Liam Payne, Dies at 31