According to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Lord Zac Goldsmith has resigned from his position as a minister, after declining to accept responsibility for his critique of the Commons inquiry into Boris Johnson.
The Privileges Committee revealed that, the Peer was one of 10 Tories who participated in an effort to obstruct their investigation. The only serving minister who received criticisms from the cross-party committee was the Johnson loyalist, Zac Goldsmith.
On the contrary, Lord Goldsmith claimed he left because of the “apathy” of the administration toward climate change.
In a strong worded resignation letter, Zac stated that, he was “horrified” at the government’s forsaking its environmental pledges, and relinquishing its leadership on the international arena. He mentioned the repeal of a landmark animal welfare law, and the renunciation of a vow to allocate £11.6 billion in UK aid to the environment and climate.
“The problem is not that the government is hostile to the environment, it is that you, our prime minister, are simply uninterested. That signal, or lack of it, has trickled down through Whitehall and caused a kind of paralysis.”
Lord Zac Goldsmith.
Prime Minister Sunak, on the other hand, wrote in a letter to Lord Goldsmith; “You were asked to apologize for your comments about the Privileges Committee, as we felt they were incompatible with your position as a Minister of the Crown. You’ve opted to go in a different direction.”
He described Lord Goldsmith as a “vocal advocate of some of the most important issues that the UK and the world face today.” “The UK continues to play an important role globally in tackling climate change, and preserving the environment,” Sunak continued.
Zac’s resignation comes two days after UK lost its leadership in climate issues. This was signaled by the government’s climate watchdog, the Climate Change Committee.
As a minister in the Foreign Office, Lord Goldsmith was in charge of Asia, energy, the environment, and the climate.
Following the publishing of the Privilege Committee findings, both Labour and the Liberal Democrats urged Lord Goldsmith to quit. However, Rishi Sunak’s spokesman stated that, the Prime Minister remained fully confident in him.
Liberal Democrat spokesman Sarah Olney, who took over Lord Goldsmith’s Richmond Park seat in 2019, said Mr. Sunak “should have had the guts” to fire him. The administration “doesn’t give a damn about the environment and animal rights,” according to Ms. Olney. Olney asserted that, Zac’s resignation proves her point.
According to Labour’s Shadow Environment Minister, Jim McMahon, “Rishi Sunak’s weakness is laid bare, as 24 hours after he refused to condemn Zac Goldsmith, Goldsmith scathingly condemns him.”
Lord Goldsmith’s “passion” for the environment is “second to none,” according to former Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries, another close ally of Mr. Johnson, who was implicated in the Privileges Committee report. Nadine also claimed that, the administration was “lucky” to have him.
Moreover, the committee’s findings revealed that, “unprecedented and coordinated pressure” was applied to its panel members, as they probed on former Prime Minister Boris Johnson lockdown parties at Downing Street.
Lord Goldsmith’s expressed his agreement for the idea that, the inquiry was a “witch hunt” and a “kangaroo court” as cited in the report’s evidence.
Other Conservatives named in the report, on the other hand, accused the committee of attempting to stifle free speech. Lord Goldsmith, a strong admirer of Mr Johnson, had served in his cabinet as a Junior Environment Minister.
Boris Johnson named him a Peer, after he lost his seat as Conservative MP for Richmond Park to the Liberal Democrats in the 2019 general election.
READ ALSO:Sunak To Launch The 15-Year Plan For NHS
