The Office of the Attorney General has filed an appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit and discharge Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson and businessman Richard Jakpa, reigniting a high-profile legal battle that has drawn significant public and political attention.
The Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has petitioned the Supreme Court to set aside the Court of Appeal’s ruling and order Dr. Forson and Mr. Jakpa to return to the High Court to continue their trial. The legal case revolves around allegations of causing financial loss to the state in a controversial ambulance procurement deal.
In his appeal, the Attorney General argued that the majority of the Court of Appeal misdirected themselves regarding the fundamental principles that guide the standard of proof required to determine whether the prosecution has established a case that the accused persons should answer.
“The majority decision failed to give due regard to the fact that whether a ‘prima facie case’ has been made by the prosecution is the true standard required in assessing whether the prosecution has made a case for the accused persons to answer.”
Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame
The core of the appeal hinges on the legal interpretation of the establishment of letters of credit within the controversial contract. The Attorney General contended that the Court of Appeal erred in its finding that the creation of these letters of credit did not constitute payment under the contract, which was integral to the alleged financial loss incurred by the state.
According to Mr. Dame, this conclusion is inconsistent with the evidence presented during the trial and is therefore untenable.
Further intensifying the legal debate, the Attorney General disputed the Court of Appeal’s determination that the Ministry of Health, rather than Dr. Forson, was responsible for the financial loss.
The majority ruling had held that the Ministry’s actions, specifically its directive to halt the production of ambulances before they were shipped, was the root cause of the loss, rather than the authorization of letters of credit by the first accused, Dr. Forson.
“The majority failed to consider the evidence on record that the Ministry of Health specifically ordered Big Sea General Trading LLC to stop producing the ambulances before the vehicles were shipped.
“The majority failed to consider the fact that the Ministry of Health never requested the Ministry of Finance to authorize the Bank of Ghana to establish the letters of credit which were used to pay for the vehicles.”
Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame
In addition, the Attorney General takes issue with the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of the prosecution’s claim that the transaction lacked the necessary parliamentary approval, describing this as an afterthought.
Mr. Dame maintained that the absence of such approval is a critical aspect of the prosecution’s case, as it falls under the broader issue of “lack of due cause and authorization,” which was included in the particulars of the offense.
The appeal further elaborated that the prosecution had provided evidence during the trial demonstrating that the transaction, classified as an international business or economic deal, required parliamentary approval—a requirement that was allegedly not met.
The Attorney General contended that the Court of Appeal’s majority decision erred in overlooking this crucial point, thus contributing to a flawed judgment.
The document, signed by the Director of Public Prosecution, Mrs. Yvonne Atakora Obuobisah, underscores the Attorney General’s belief that the Court of Appeal’s decision contradicts the evidence presented and calls for the Supreme Court to rectify the alleged errors.
Specifically, the Attorney General is urging the apex court to reverse the acquittal and discharge of Dr. Forson and Mr. Jakpa, and to order that they continue to stand trial at the High Court.
The legal proceedings against Dr. Ato Forson, a prominent politician and Minority Leader in Parliament, and Richard Jakpa, a businessman, have garnered significant attention. The case involved allegations of causing financial loss to the state in connection with the procurement of ambulances by the Ministry of Health.
Dr. Forson and Jakpa were initially charged with various offenses, including wilfully causing financial loss to the state. In a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal acquitted and discharged Dr. Forson and Jakpa, concluding that the prosecution had not established a case for them to answer.
The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for both the legal and political landscape in Ghana. Should the Supreme Court grant the Attorney General’s request, Dr. Forson and Jakpa would once again face trial, prolonging the legal battle that has already drawn considerable public interest.
READ ALSO: Lebanon Expresses Support For Renewed Ceasefire Push
