Environment Secretary, Steve Barclay, is facing criticism for not disclosing a potential conflict of interest regarding a proposed waste incineration facility in his constituency.
Barclay has been openly against the waste-to-energy plant in Wisbech, which is to become one of Europe’s largest incinerators.
According to the latest register of ministers’ interests, Barclay has not officially declared his involvement in the project in Cambridgeshire as a potential conflict of interest.
This is despite the fact that the plant’s approval falls under the purview of the Environment Agency, which he supervises.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) expressed concerns regarding the potential conflict of interest surrounding Steve Barclay’s involvement in the waste incineration plant project.
These concerns were serious enough for DEFRA to bring the matter to the attention of the ethics team at the Cabinet Office.
In response to these concerns, the department stated that Barclay has recused himself from involvement in the decision-making process regarding the approval of the plant.
However, the Labour Party raised doubts about whether Barclay has communicated adequately with officials at the Environment Agency regarding the matter.
![Steve Barclay Criticized For Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest 2 Steve Reeds](https://thevaultznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Steve-Reeds.jpg)
Steve Reed, the shadow environment secretary, expressed his dismay on Friday, March 22 stating, “It is shocking that the secretary of state may have abused his position as environment secretary to prop up his constituency vote. The public rightly expects ministers to serve the British people, and not themselves. The environment secretary needs to immediately address these concerns.”
A spokesperson for the Environment Department said: “The secretary of state is recused from the decision. No decision has been taken. Mark Spencer is the minister responsible and would take any decision on this issue.”
The German energy company MVV Environment proposed the construction of an incinerator aimed at converting non-recyclable waste into energy. This plant, if approved, would have the capacity to incinerate over 600,000 tonnes of waste annually and generate up to 50MW of power.
Steve Barclay opposed the project, referring to it as “terrible news for our area.” Despite his objections, his cabinet colleague Claire Coutinho, acting in her capacity as energy secretary, gave the scheme the green light last month.
However, final approval rests with the Environment Agency.
After Coutinho’s decision, Barclay said: “As both a member of parliament and a resident living just outside Wisbech I remain strongly opposed to this proposal and will continue to do everything possible to fight it.”
Ethics Unit Consulted Amidst Concerns Over Barclay’s Actions
Officials within the Environment Department raised concerns regarding the issue and subsequently reached out to the government’s propriety and ethics unit for guidance. Discussions ensued between officials from the ethics unit and Steve Barclay concerning the matter.
Reed wrote to Barclay on Friday asking for details of any communication between the environment secretary and his officials about the scheme, as well as demanding to know when he had recused himself from the overall decision.
Downing Street on Friday refused to say when Barclay had recused himself. A spokesperson for the Prime Minister said: “It’s not uncommon that ministers to balance their work as a constituency MP with their roles of ministers and there are established processes which support that.”
They added: “We never provide a running commentary on those processes.”
In the United Kingdom, there are legal and ethical standards that guide politicians and public officials in disclosing and managing conflicts of interest. These standards aim to maintain transparency, uphold integrity, and ensure that decisions are made in the best interest of the public.
This principle emphasized that holders of public office must avoid any obligations to individuals or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.
Public officials should not make decisions to gain financial or material benefits for themselves, their families, or friends.
READ MORE: Bulls Celebrate as GSE Performance Soars