Commenting on the court’s decision to admit Richard Jakpa’s recorded tape of the Attorney General as evidence in the Ato Forson Ambulance case, lawyer Kweku Paintsil stated that he was not surprised by the judge’s ruling, as it is within her discretion to determine the course of the trial.
He pointed out that the judge has the discretion to make rulings that will guarantee not only a just outcome but also a transparent and fair process, where justice is not only served but also visibly demonstrated to all parties involved.
“I don’t have any qualms with her at all with her decision to permit that evidence to come in. But when evidence comes in, that’s where the real battle starts. There is something in law we call the probative value; how the evidence will have to be evaluated together with all evidences that come to the court at the end of the trial. The real issue is, of what value is it [the tape] going to be. The game starts now”.
Kweku Paintsil
According to Kweku Paintsil, any evidence presented by the accused individuals is aimed at supporting their defense strategy, with the ultimate goal of persuading the court to acquit them of the charges and secure their release at the conclusion of the trial.
He stated that, in his personal opinion, considering the severity of the charges against the accused and the evidence presented so far, it appears challenging for them to be acquitted, although he conceded that there might be additional information or nuances that he is not aware of, which could potentially impact the outcome.
Furthermore, Kweku Paintsil emphasized that the purpose of admitting evidence in court is to aid the judge in making an informed decision, highlighting that the court’s role is to evaluate the credibility and weight of the evidence presented, to reach a fair and just verdict.
“If you’ve been charged with an offense, your duty is to demonstrate that you are not guilty of the offense”. – Kweku Paintsil.
He stressed that the prosecutor’s burden is to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused, emphasizing that the prosecution must present a case that is so compelling and robust that there is no reasonable doubt in the mind of the judge that the accused is indeed guilty.
Innocence Hinges On Defense Strategy
Furthermore, Kweku Paintsil highlighted that the key question is how the allegations against the Attorney General and the admitted evidence will be used by the defense team to demonstrate their client’s innocence, and whether they can successfully show that the accused persons are not guilty.
He explained that the judge’s ruling follows the guidelines for evidence admission and that the judge is not obligated to assign weight or significance to admitted evidence at the time of its submission.
“I mean it is not the judge’s duty at this stage to weigh how that evidence is going to assist the case one way or the other. But having regards to everything that has transpired, whether it is proper for her to accept the evidence…and to use that evidence in the light of all the evidence in her assessment of the parties’ case before the court. That is all what this business today is about”.
Kweku Paintsil
He pointed out that ultimately, the judge’s responsibility is to carefully evaluate all the evidence presented, consider all relevant factors, and decide whether the prosecution has provided sufficient evidence to prove the accused persons’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
“And like I said the evidence is to show that outside the court, the Attorney General has made some conversations in which he [AG] had said the accused is not guilty”. – Kweku Paintsil
He emphasized that ultimately, it’s not the Attorney General’s statements that will sway the court’s decision, but rather the evidence presented, including the tape evidence, which will carry the most weight in the court’s deliberations.
READ ALSO: UK, US And Canada Accuse Russia Of Interfering In Moldovan Elections
