The African Center for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) has issued an urgent call for immediate consultations between Ghana’s three highest leaders—President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin, and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo.
This call comes amidst a deepening parliamentary impasse over which caucus holds the majority in the legislature, with the potential to destabilize the nation’s democratic process. Dr. Rasheed Draman, Executive Director of ACEPA called for Ghana’s three arms of government to meet and resolve the issue.
“It is a very serious matter for our democracy. And I think that if I could offer any advice, the three branches of government, our president, our speaker, and our Chief Justice, would have to have a conversation.
“Perhaps that includes the leadership of parliament so that we avoid any chaotic situation because this could lead to a breakdown of law and order.”
Dr. Rasheed Draman, Executive Director of ACEPA
The crisis has its roots in a controversial parliamentary decision by Speaker Alban Bagbin, who declared four parliamentary seats vacant. This declaration altered the parliamentary composition, raising questions about which caucus—either the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) or the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC)—now holds the majority.
The issue has become more complex following a Supreme Court ruling that stayed the execution of the Speaker’s decision, preventing the seats from being filled or vacant status officially recognized.
This legal back-and-forth has left Ghana in a precarious political situation, with the minority caucus continuing to assert that it holds the majority in Parliament. The standoff risks affecting the day-to-day functioning of the legislature, as majority status dictates which caucus holds greater influence in passing legislation and decision-making.
The three arms of government—executive, legislative, and judiciary—play distinct yet interconnected roles in Ghana’s governance structure. The executive, headed by President Nana Akufo-Addo, holds significant influence over policy-making and national administration.
The legislature, led by Speaker Alban Bagbin, is responsible for making and passing laws, while the judiciary, under the stewardship of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, interprets and enforces these laws.
Given their critical roles, ACEPA’s call for these leaders to meet reflected the severity of the situation. A consensus among the President, the Speaker, and the Chief Justice could provide a pathway to de-escalate the tensions and restore the balance necessary for effective governance.
Importantly, it would also signal unity at the highest levels of government, an important message during times of political uncertainty.
Potential Ramifications for Ghana’s Democracy
At the heart of the matter is not only the question of which caucus holds the majority but also the broader implications for Ghana’s democracy.
Dr. Draman also expressed fears that if the situation escalates, it could erode trust in Ghana’s civilian institutions and open the door for military intervention. He warned of the potential consequences of a power vacuum, emphasizing how fragile democratic systems can become in moments of institutional deadlock.
“It could lead to the breakdown of our democracy. Can you imagine, for one moment, the military getting in and saying that we have to resolve our differences, which is Parliament, because that forum is not working anymore?
“There is a breakdown of that forum. What it could do? It could lead to the usurpation of civilian power and all the consequences that could follow.”
Dr. Rasheed Draman, Executive Director of ACEPA
A prolonged parliamentary impasse could undermine the legitimacy of democratic institutions, erode public trust in elected officials, and jeopardize Ghana’s long-standing reputation as one of Africa’s most stable democracies.
ACEPA’s call for dialogue emphasizes the need for political maturity and cooperation, especially during critical moments. The stakes are high. Should the impasse continue, it could paralyze the legislative process, slow government functioning, and heighten political tensions nationwide.
READ ALSO: Labour Expected to Extend “Stealth Tax” Amid Criticism
