Following the Attorney General’s (AG) press conference, Legal scholar, Professor Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, has defended his approach in handling high profile cases, insisting that the AG’s transparency should be applauded rather than condemned.
According to Professor Appiagyei-Atua, those who are criticizing the Attorney General today would have been the same voices accusing him of secrecy had he chosen not to disclose details about the case.
“The Attorney General acted rightly. I don’t see anything wrong with what the Attorney General did.
“I think we want to have the Attorney General’s office being as transparent as the current office is doing because that tells us that we are in the known about what is going on”
Professor Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, Legal Scholar
He emphasized that making such information available to the public ensures accountability and prevents misinformation.
For the legal scholar, the argument that the Attorney General is attempting to influence public opinion does not hold, as those same critics would have accused him of opacity had he withheld the information.
Professor Appiagyei-Atua further highlighted that previous decisions by the Attorney General, particularly concerning the discontinuation of certain cases, had been met with demands for explanations.
He argued that if transparency is maintained consistently, it would remove suspicions of selective prosecution, particularly in politically sensitive cases.
For him, the decision to communicate openly about legal proceedings, is a positive step that should be encouraged rather than vilified.
“If that trend continues, it will help create that transparency with the cases that the Attorney General’s office is doing, particularly in the context of politically exposed persons. Because if that is not done, then there will be a lot of speculation and some claims of witch-hunting and so on”
Professor Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, Legal Scholar
Minority Pushes Back
However, the Attorney General’s transparency has not been welcomed in all quarters.
Lawyer and political commentator, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, has strongly challenged the credibility of the Attorney General’s account, arguing that it is a fabrication designed to deflect attention from the real issues.
He accused the Attorney General of attempting to downplay allegations surrounding the search of Dr. Ernest Addison’s residence.
“Dr. Addison remains silent because he has found his voice in the Minority. The Attorney General’s account is clearly a fabrication”
Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, Lawyer and Political Commentator
For Baffour Awuah, the dispute boils down to whether the public should believe the Attorney General or the Minority’s version of events.
He contended that the Attorney General’s team had failed to provide a clear justification for the removal of the hard drive from Dr. Addison’s CCTV system during the search of his residence.
“We have the account given to us by Dr. Addison. Dr. Addison hasn’t come out to say that our account is untrue. It is the Attorney General who is suggesting that our account is untrue. And I am saying that by the Deputy Attorney General’s (Justice Srem-Sai) account, it is obvious that their account is untrue”
Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, Lawyer and Political Commentator
Allegations and Counter Arguments
Baffour Awuah raised concerns over the manner in which evidence was collected at Dr. Addison’s residence, arguing that the Attorney General’s team overstepped its authority by conducting what he described as a “fishing expedition,” rather than a legally sanctioned search.
For him, this raises doubts about the true intent behind the search and fuels suspicion that the removal of the CCTV hard drive was deliberate.
“The question that arises is whether or not indeed that is what he went for. Does that not support our case, that he took that out so that whatever he did in that house, there will be no record of it? That is our position”
Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, Lawyer and Political Commentator
When challenged on whether there was concrete evidence to support allegations of theft, Baffour Awuah remained firm, insisting that the claims originated from Dr. Addison himself.
“We have made an allegation. The story came from Dr. Addison. Dr. Addison hasn’t come out to deny it,” he maintained.
Silence and Political Alignments
Addressing the argument that Dr. Addison’s silence could be interpreted as a lack of confirmation, Baffour Awuah dismissed that notion, suggesting instead that Addison was strategically allowing the Minority to speak on his behalf.
On why Dr. Addison hadn’t resorted to the strategy of former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta, who was vocal about his raid, to the extent of even involving his lawyers, he expressed:
“Ken Ofori-Atta is not Dr. Addison. Dr. Addison has found a voice in the Minority.”
For him, the Attorney General’s position that the Minority’s claims are unreliable is equally questionable, as his own account is based on secondhand reports from those National Security officers involved in the search.
“The AG’s case is that we were not there, and so our account cannot be trusted. But what about the AG? The AG is also receiving an update from people who supposedly went to the house to gather evidence”
Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, Lawyer and Political Commentator
The actions of the Attorney General have once again ignited a debate over transparency, political accountability, and the handling of high-profile cases in Ghana.
While some critics argue that his public disclosures are prejudicial, others maintain that they are necessary for fostering trust in the judicial process
The debate continues to draw sharp reactions from opposing sides.
While some, like Professor Appiagyei-Atua, argue that openness is crucial for building public confidence in the legal system, others, such as Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, see it as a tool for shaping narratives and avoiding scrutiny.
Will the Attorney General’s approach set a new standard for transparency in legal proceedings or will it deepen the partisan divisions surrounding high-profile cases in Ghana?
READ MORE: T-Bill Market Wobbles As Government Records 18% Shortfall in Auction
