Global ratings agency Fitch has downgraded the African Export-Import Bank, Afreximbank, to junk status and withdrawn its future ratings, bringing to an end a relationship that had grown increasingly tense and combative.
The downgrade to junk status follows a public dispute between the agency and the Africa-focused lender over the assessment of its credit profile, risk exposure and treatment in Ghana’s recent debt restructuring.
Fitch said its decision reflected heightened concerns about Afreximbank’s risk profile, particularly following developments linked to Ghana’s sovereign debt workout. The ratings agency stressed that its conclusions were based on credit fundamentals and recent evidence which, in its view, pointed to rising vulnerabilities at the lender.
Credit risks and policy concerns flagged
According to Fitch, the downgrade was driven by concerns over high credit risks, weak risk management policies and uncertainty surrounding Afreximbank’s exposure to loans extended to its member countries.
The agency said these factors raised questions about the lender’s ability to withstand stress in an environment where several African economies are grappling with debt sustainability challenges.
“The bank’s inclusion in Ghana’s restructuring underlines its weakening policy importance, in our view,” Fitch wrote.
The agency added that Afreximbank’s apparent exposure to losses in Ghana’s debt restructuring significantly altered its assessment of the lender’s risk standing. Fitch said the bank’s risk profile had been revised upward to ‘high risk’ from ‘medium’, reflecting what it described as a deterioration in the strength of its balance sheet protections.
Ghana debt restructuring raises red flags
Ghana’s debt restructuring has been central to Fitch’s reassessment of Afreximbank. On December 25, Ghana announced a “resolution” of its $750 million loan to Afreximbank, a development that was widely interpreted as part of the broader sovereign debt workout under the country’s economic recovery programme.
Reports indicated that the Paris Club of official creditors embraced the resolution, a move seen by market participants as confirmation that Afreximbank may have absorbed losses on the loan. Fitch said this outcome undermined the perception that the bank enjoyed preferred creditor status, which traditionally shields multilateral and regional development institutions from losses during sovereign restructurings.
“We view this as evidence that Afreximbank did not benefit from its preferred creditor status,” Fitch wrote.
In Fitch’s assessment, the Ghana case sets an important precedent that could have implications for Afreximbank’s future dealings with heavily indebted member states. The agency warned that similar treatments in other jurisdictions could further weaken the bank’s credit profile.
Afreximbank severs ties with Fitch
In response to the downgrade and broader disagreements over methodology, Afreximbank said it was severing ties with Fitch. The bank cited a “firm belief” that the agency’s rating approach no longer reflected an understanding of the bank’s mission and mandate.
Afreximbank has long argued that conventional ratings frameworks do not adequately capture the developmental role it plays across Africa, particularly in supporting trade finance, economic resilience and countercyclical lending during periods of crisis. The lender has maintained that its shareholder structure, policy role and historical performance distinguish it from purely commercial banks.
At the time of Fitch’s announcement, Afreximbank did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the downgrade itself. However, its decision to cut ties with the agency signals a decisive break after months of friction over credit assessments.
Implications for market perception
Fitch said its withdrawal of Afreximbank’s rating was for “commercial reasons”, but the move carries wider implications for how the bank is perceived by investors and counterparties. With Fitch stepping away, Moody’s is now the only one of the so-called Big Three ratings agencies still providing a rating on Afreximbank.
Market analysts note that a reduced number of ratings can limit transparency for international investors, particularly at a time when funding conditions remain tight and risk appetite for emerging and frontier markets is selective. A downgrade to junk status, even if disputed by the issuer, can also affect borrowing costs and access to certain pools of capital.
At the same time, supporters of Afreximbank argue that the institution’s strong shareholder backing, strategic importance to African trade and long track record of support during economic shocks should continue to underpin confidence in its operations.
Broader debate over development lenders
The standoff between Fitch and Afreximbank highlights a broader debate over how development oriented lenders should be assessed by global ratings agencies. As more African countries undergo debt restructurings, questions are emerging about creditor hierarchies, preferred status and the balance between policy mandates and financial risk.
For Afreximbank, the fallout from Ghana’s debt resolution and the subsequent downgrade represents a critical moment. How the bank navigates investor concerns, manages its risk exposure and communicates its role going forward will be closely watched by markets and policymakers alike.
READ ALSO:United We Stand – Bawumia Rallies NPP after Victory
