The Ghana National Council of Private Schools (GNACOPS) has called on government to fundamentally rebalance investment between boarding and day secondary education, arguing that the country’s recurring school placement crisis stems not from failures within the Computerised School Selection and Placement System (CSSPS), but from a deeper structural policy problem tied to how boarding education is subsidised.
GNACOPS argued that every placement season, Ghana relives the same cycle of disputes over cut-off points and competition for Category A schools, with CSSPS repeatedly blamed for a shortfall it did not create.
The Council warned that this year’s conversation, like those before it, risks stopping at the surface rather than addressing the underlying policy driving the crisis.
According to GNACOPS, government’s continued heavy subsidisation of boarding education has effectively made boarding placement the default expectation for parents and candidates nationwide, regardless of whether such capacity actually exists to meet growing demand.
The Council explained that unlike candidate numbers, which continue to rise each year, boarding infrastructure such as dormitories, dining halls and residential facilities cannot expand at a comparable pace.
“Boarding capacity is fixed, dormitories, dining halls and residential infrastructure cannot expand as quickly as the number of qualifying candidates grows each year,”
GNACOPS
GNACOPS argued that this structural imbalance produces a predictable outcome each year, rising demand for a limited resource, intensifying competition among candidates, and a placement crisis that resurfaces with every new cohort of BECE graduates.
According to the Council, CSSPS is ultimately left to ration a scarcity of boarding places that it neither created nor can resolve through algorithmic or technical adjustments alone.
The Case for Structural Policy Reform
Rather than continuing to redistribute an insufficient supply of boarding places each year, GNACOPS proposed a more fundamental policy shift, one focused on directly addressing the underlying imbalance between boarding and day school investment.
The Council specifically proposed that government consider redirecting a significant share of existing boarding subsidies toward the expansion of quality day secondary education.
This would involve building and upgrading day schools within reach of communities, adequately resourcing them to compete academically with more established institutions, and repositioning day education as a genuine first choice for parents and candidates, rather than a fallback option pursued only when boarding placement proves unavailable.
“A durable solution requires addressing the underlying policy rather than repeatedly redistributing an insufficient supply of boarding places,”
GNACOPS
Framing The Urgency Of Reform
GNACOPS stressed that each academic year that passes without meaningful structural reform effectively condemns another cohort of candidates and their families to the same avoidable placement cycle.
The Council maintained that while CSSPS can continue managing the immediate pressures of each placement season, only a deliberate shift in boarding policy would resolve the underlying pressure at its actual source.
This framing positioned the Council’s proposal not merely as a preferred policy option, but as a necessary intervention to prevent the recurrence of placement crises in subsequent academic years.
Call For National Dialogue
Considering these concerns, GNACOPS called on the Ministry of Education and all relevant education stakeholders to open a national conversation specifically focused on rebalancing investment between boarding and day secondary education.
The Council argued that such a conversation would allow Ghana to shift from a pattern of managing the placement crisis on an annual basis toward genuinely resolving it on a permanent footing.
The Council reiterated its readiness to engage directly with the Minister of Education and other relevant stakeholders on the matter at the earliest available opportunity, signalling its intention to actively participate in shaping any eventual policy discussions on the issue.
GNACOPS’s intervention adds a distinct structural dimension to the ongoing national debate over this year’s BECE placement outcomes, shifting attention away from immediate administrative fixes and toward the longer-term policy architecture shaping demand for boarding education in Ghana.
With the Council now calling for direct engagement with the Ministry, attention will likely turn to whether government responds to this specific structural critique, and whether any future policy reconsideration includes a rebalancing of investment between boarding and day secondary school infrastructure.
READ MORE: Education Expert Says BECE Placement Policy Puts Private Schools Under Pressure
