The Ghana Chamber of Mines Chief Executive Officer, Kenneth Ashigbey has raised critical concerns over the state’s utilization of tax proceeds generated from the extractives sector, demanding strict accountability for statutory payments made to the government.
Speaking on behalf of mining corporate entities across the country, the advocacy body highlighted the significant financial contributions made by its member companies while questioning the tangible socio-economic outcomes delivered to citizens.
The Chamber underscored that without transparent governance frameworks governing mineral revenue, public trust will continue to erode despite high fiscal receipts remitted into the national treasury.
“Over 24 billion you know cities to government in terms of tax. How is that being used? There’s a reason why we think that minerals revenue management act once it’s put together. Then can then also look into the heritage fund.”
Kenneth Ashigbey

Expanding on its appeal for transparent fiscal management, the mining trade group emphasized that the continuous extraction of depletable mineral resources must yield direct, long-term national benefits rather than simply funding routine state operations.
The Chamber pointed out that while mining entities fulfill their heavy tax obligations, structural gaps in public financial management prevent these receipts from translating into lasting infrastructure and local development.
Consequently, industry leaders are advocating for a comprehensive legislative reform specifically through a Minerals Revenue Management Act to institute institutional oversight and guarantee that revenue collection directly supports long-term national development goals.
Institutionalizing Fiscal Transparency Through Legislation
The fundamental driver behind the Chamber’s call for a dedicated legislative framework stem from historical gaps in state expenditure tracking across the extractive sector.
Mining, by its nature, involves the depletion of non-renewable natural assets; once extracted, these resources cannot be replenished or harvested again.
When tax earnings from these finite deposits are absorbed entirely into general recurrent government expenditure, future generations are left without tangible infrastructure or long-term assets to show for the country’s mineral wealth.

In response to these systemic vulnerabilities, the proposed Minerals Revenue Management Act seeks to mirror successful structural benchmarks established in other extractive industries, such as the Petroleum Revenue Management Act.
By capping administrative discretion over state collections and establishing strict statutory oversight mechanisms, the proposed law intends to enforce public disclosures, mandatory independent audits, and clear reporting rules regarding how every cedi derived from the soil is disbursed.
Safeguarding Financial Holdings via the Heritage Fund
A central pillar of the Chamber’s legislative advocacy centers on the operationalization and expansion of a designated Heritage Fund for mineral resource management.
Under current fiscal setups, intergenerational equity remains heavily compromised, as royalty payouts and corporate taxes are primarily deployed to manage short-term deficit pressures and daily public accounts.

Establishing an endowment fund specifically dedicated to future generations guarantees that resource wealth generates sustainable dividend yields long after primary mineral deposits are exhausted.
By locking away a designated percentage of mineral taxes during economic booms, the nation builds a permanent financial cushion that insulates the broader economy from non-renewable asset depletion and ensures lasting national prosperity.
Navigating Price Volatility via Stabilization Mechanisms
The necessity for statutory spending controls is further accentuated by the extreme volatility inherent in global commodity markets over extended business cycles.
Mineral revenues fluctuate sharply based on world market dynamics, leaving state budgets highly vulnerable when gold prices retreat from historical highs down toward lower trading thresholds.

Without a statutory Stabilization Fund, fiscal policy becomes inherently pro-cyclical leading to structural overspending during market rallies and severe budgetary shortfalls during cyclical downturns.
As commodity values fluctuate between historic bull runs and market contractions, establishing a structured financial buffer ensures that national expenditure remains resilient and predictable during times of economic hardship.
READ ALSO: Strongman and Kweku Darlington Drop ‘Disco’ Friday










