Bright Simons, a renowned policy analyst and the honorary Vice President of IMANI Africa, has launched a blistering critique against Engineers & Planners (E&P) regarding the company’s ongoing involvement in the sale of gold from its Damang Mine concession that lacks parliamentary ratification.
At the heart of his concern is the fundamental legal principle that until a mining lease is formally ratified by the legislature, the mineral rights and the gold itself remain exclusively vested in the State of Ghana, rendering any unauthorized commercial extraction or sale a direct violation of the law.
“Why are they selling gold from a mine when their lease has yet to be ratified by Parliament? The law is clear. UNTIL Parliament ratifies a lease, the gold in any concession belongs to the State, and no other company.”
Bright Simons, a renowned policy analyst
The situation suggests a troubling trend where corporate interests are being prioritized over established regulatory protocols, effectively sidestepping the oversight mechanisms designed to protect national assets.
Bright Simons argued that even if the gold in question consists of stockpiles inherited from previous operators like Gold Fields, these resources are legally considered property of the State, not the private entity currently operating on the site.
By moving to sell these minerals without the necessary legislative backing, E&P not only bypasses critical legal hurdles but also attempts to frame its activities as a service to the nation, a narrative Simons labels as misleading and inherently problematic.
The Erosion of Regulatory Integrity
The central issue raised by Bright Simons concerns the dangerous precedent being set by such administrative shortcuts.
When companies, dubbed “national champions,” are permitted to ignore the foundational requirements of mining legislation, the broader regulatory culture in Ghana is severely compromised.
Bright Simons suggests that the “disorganized” manner in which the E&P transition was managed characterized by hasty tenders and a lack of due process creates a climate where legal requirements become optional.
This approach, he posits, transforms potentially productive local firms into “national problem children” that require excessive hand-holding, a situation he believes is detrimental to the development of robust and truly competitive Ghanaian enterprises.
Misleading the National Interest
The impact of these concerns extends beyond legal technicalities, as they distort the economic reality of the country’s mining sector.
By operating without a ratified lease, the entity avoids the rigorous scrutiny that accompanies standard parliamentary oversight, which is intended to ensure that the State receives fair value and that environmental and social safeguards are strictly enforced.
Critics note that such unauthorized sales create a vacuum of accountability, where the public is kept in the dark regarding the true fiscal benefits of these transactions.
Furthermore, the narrative that these firms are “doing Ghana a favour” serves to mask the underlying lack of transparency, distracting from the fact that true national development is built on “conditions that toughen them up for competition” rather than the perception of shielded, state-sanctioned privileges.
A Call for Institutional Discipline
Ultimately, Bright Simons advocates for a return to institutional discipline to prevent the further degradation of the mining sector’s oversight framework.
He warned that failing to hold these entities to the same standard as international operators’ risks creating a two-tiered system that undermines Ghana’s sovereign control over its natural resources.
The emphasis, he suggests, must shift toward fostering an environment where local companies achieve growth through technical and managerial excellence rather than through the exploitation of regulatory gaps.
For observers and industry stakeholders, the E&P situation stands as a stark reminder of the necessity for strict adherence to the Minerals and Mining Act, ensuring that national wealth is managed within the clear, predictable boundaries of the law.
READ ALSO: Cedi Ranked Among Africa’s Worst Performing Currencies
