In recent years, Ghana’s Electoral Commission (EC) has taken significant strides to enhance transparency in the electoral process. However, despite these improvements, mistrust in the EC remains deeply entrenched among the public and political stakeholders.
During a recent interview, Albert Arhin, the National Coordinator of the Coalition for Domestic Election Observers (CODEO), highlighted this paradox. Mr. Arhin acknowledged the advancements in the electoral process, noting that transparency has indeed improved. Innovations such as real-time results transmission, the publication of voter lists, and the presence of domestic and international observers have contributed to a more open and accountable system. Nevertheless, these measures have not translated into increased trust in the EC.
Albert Arhin, the National Coordinator of the Coalition for Domestic Election Observers (CODEO) clearly stated, “Transparency has improved, but mistrust of the EC is still there.”
The core issue, as Mr. Arhin pointed out, lies in the perception of the EC as biased. The Commission is often seen as an ally of the incumbent government and an adversary to opposition parties. This perception has roots in historical precedents and continues to influence public opinion. The EC’s efforts to be transparent are overshadowed by the suspicion that its actions are influenced by political pressures.
The persistent mistrust in the EC has significant implications for Ghana’s democratic stability. When a substantial portion of the electorate doubts the impartiality of the electoral body, it undermines the legitimacy of election results. This can lead to increased political tension, post-election disputes, and even violence.
Mr. Arhin further highlighted that mistrust in the EC exacerbates political polarization. Parties and their supporters are more likely to reject election outcomes if they believe the process was unfairly managed. This deepens divisions and hinders efforts to achieve national cohesion and unity.
“A lack of trust in the electoral process can also contribute to democratic backsliding. When citizens lose faith in the mechanisms of democracy, they become disillusioned and disengaged. This apathy can lead to lower voter turnout and reduced participation in civic activities, weakening the democratic fabric of the nation.”
Albert Arhin, the National Coordinator of the Coalition for Domestic Election Observers (CODEO)
Transparency should not be limited to the technical aspects of the electoral process alone; it should also extend to the communication channels and mechanisms employed by the EC.
Clear and timely communication from the EC regarding electoral procedures, updates, and results can go a long way in dispelling doubts and building trust. Political parties should feel included and sufficiently informed throughout the entire process to ensure a level playing field for all participants.
Stakeholder Involvement: A Path to Trust
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a392/0a392c7a2b5228f8c1b7ca1bcdfd23e93813db4f" alt="EC’s Transparency Gains Overshadowed by Lingering Mistrust 2 Political Parties"
One of the primary recommendations from Mr. Arhin is for the EC to enhance its communication with all political parties. Effective communication is crucial in building trust and dispelling doubts.
The EC needs to engage more actively with political stakeholders, civil society organizations (CSOs), and the general public to explain its processes, decisions, and the rationale behind them. Transparent communication can mitigate misunderstandings and reduce the space for speculation and misinformation.
The issue of mistrust in the EC is not new. Following the 2020 general elections, CODEO urged the EC to work towards regaining public confidence. In its second and final post-election statement, the coalition emphasized the need for the EC to “reflect carefully on its election results management processes and make appropriate reforms to deepen stakeholder trust and public confidence in electoral outcomes.”
“Adequately involve relevant stakeholders such as political parties, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE), security agencies, the National Media Communication (NMC), and the media, among others, and take on board their inputs.”
Albert Arhin, the National Coordinator of the Coalition for Domestic Election Observers (CODEO)
The oversight of these independent bodies according to CODEO will provide an additional layer of accountability and enhance public confidence in the electoral process.
For the EC to build trust, it must prioritize transparency, accountability, and communication. Continuous engagement with stakeholders and the public is essential. The EC should also consider adopting more robust measures to demonstrate its independence from political influences.
This could include legal and institutional reforms that safeguard the Commission’s autonomy. The health of Ghana’s democracy depends on an electoral system that is not only transparent but also trusted by all its citizens.
READ ALSO: Stonebwoy Notifies Charterhouse To Announce 2019 Artiste of the Year Winner