Franklin Cudjoe, President of IMANI Africa, has highlighted the detrimental impact of excessive cabinet appointments on governance and fiscal discipline.
He argued that an inflated number of ministers is often correlated with increased corruption and inefficient governance.
According to Cudjoe, a larger cabinet tends to drive up government expenditure, leading to higher deficits and placing unnecessary strain on national resources.
He underscored the need for leaner government structures to foster transparency and fiscal responsibility.
“Historical data show fluctuations in ministerial counts under various administrations: the National Democratic Congress (NDC) government appointed 82 ministers between 1992 and 2000, and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) increased this count to 93 ministers between 2000 and 2008.
“The NDC under Professor Mills then reduced this to 75, the lowest on record, while the NPP under President Akufo-Addo raised it to 110, the highest so far”.
Franklin Cudjoe
The policy analyst further elaborated that a 2020 World Bank report highlighted Ghana’s significant cabinet size under President Nana Akufo-Addo, noting it as the largest in over 25 years.
The report underscored a concerning trend, revealing a negative correlation between the number of ministers and governance outcomes.
According to the findings, an expansive cabinet often leads to inefficiencies, poor policy implementation, and weakened governance.
This, Franklin Cudjoe indicated, suggests that a bloated ministerial team can hinder effective decision-making and dilute accountability, ultimately impacting the overall quality of governance.
He emphasized the importance of streamlining government structures to enhance governance effectiveness and ensure better management of national resources.
Franklin Cudjoe Stresses Cost Savings from Reducing Ministers
Furthermore, Franklin Cudjoe emphasized the substantial financial implications of the proposed reduction in ministerial appointments.
He explained that cutting down the number of ministers could lead to significant cost savings for the government, as fewer ministers would mean reduced expenditure on salaries, allowances, and operational expenses associated with ministerial offices.
Cudjoe highlighted that these savings could be redirected towards critical sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, which are essential for national growth and improving the quality of life for citizens.
Accordingly, a leaner government structure would likely enhance efficiency, reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks, and foster a more streamlined decision-making process, ultimately contributing to better governance and economic stability.
“The NDC promises to work with 60 ministers. By decreasing the number of ministers from 110 to 50(in the case of the NPP) the government could save an estimated GHS 316,726,848 annually in salary and accommodation expenses”.
Franklin Cudjoe
Cudjoe further highlighted the long-term financial benefits of reducing the number of ministers, estimating that over a four-year period, this reduction could result in savings of approximately GHS 1,266,907,392 in ministerial expenses alone.
He elaborated that these savings would come from reduced spending on salaries, allowances, and the operational costs of maintaining a larger ministerial team.
Additionally, Cudjoe pointed out that when factoring in the ex-gratia payments traditionally awarded to outgoing ministers, the government could save an additional GHS 1,296,233,952 every four years.
This cumulative saving, he argued, represents a significant financial relief that could be redirected towards pressing developmental needs, thereby enhancing fiscal responsibility and improving the overall economic health of the nation.
However, Cudjoe noted that these projected savings do not account for the additional reductions in operational and capital expenditures that would result from streamlining the number of ministries and ministers.
He emphasized that beyond the direct financial benefits of cutting salaries and ex-gratia payments, there would be substantial savings in areas such as administrative support, office space, utilities, travel, and other logistical expenses associated with running a larger number of ministries.
Cudjoe argued that reducing the size of the government could lead to a more efficient allocation of resources.
He noted that funds that would otherwise be tied up in maintaining an oversized bureaucracy being redirected toward critical infrastructure projects, social services, and other initiatives that directly benefit the populace.
READ ALSO: Zenith Bank Ghana Clinches Prestigious ‘Bank of the Year’ Honour at The Banker Awards
