Ghana’s economic performance under the International Monetary Fund (IMF) program has exhibited a steady decline over successive reviews, with key quantitative performance criteria likely being missed, according to an analysis by Alfred Appiah, a renowned Data and Policy Analyst.
Appiah’s analysis suggests that election-related spending played a significant role in Ghana’s inability to meet the IMF’s benchmarks. He noted a gradual weakening of the IMF’s characterization of Ghana’s performance.
“In the first review in January 2024, performance was described as ‘strong’, By June, it was ‘generally strong’, and by December, ‘generally satisfactory’. The Former administration officials cite the IMF to claim they left behind a strong economy, but even that assessment shows a decline over time”.
Alfred Appiah, a renowned Data and Policy Analyst
This pattern, Appiah argued, highlights a concerning trend in Ghana’s economic management, particularly as it relates to fiscal discipline in election years.
One of the major criticisms Appiah raised is the failure of former government officials to acknowledge the deteriorating performance indicators while boasting of a robust economy under their tenure.
He asserted that the IMF’s assessments over time clearly show a downward trajectory, contradicting claims that the economy remained resilient.
Furthermore, he highlighted that none of the IMF’s reviews fully accounted for fiscal data in the months leading up to the 2024 general elections, raising concerns that the full extent of election-related expenditures has yet to be reflected in official assessments.
A particularly crucial point in Appiah’s analysis is the historical precedent of fiscal slippages during election years.
External Shocks Not Sole Contributor to Ghana’s Economic Struggles
He argued that Ghana’s economic struggles cannot be attributed solely to external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as some officials of the previous NPP administration have claimed.
Instead, he emphasized that election-related spending in 2020 was a major contributing factor to the current fiscal challenges—a pattern that appears to have repeated itself in 2024.
According to him, this should serve as an eye-opener for those who have dismissed the impact of election-year expenditures on Ghana’s macroeconomic stability.
Appiah’s assessment follows recent comments by Finance Minister Dr Cassiel Ato Forson, who indicated that Ghana’s performance under the program, based on available data as of December 2024, may have fallen short of expectations.
The IMF’s most recent review in December 2024, which largely relied on data from June 2024, did not fully capture the spending trends in the months leading up to the elections.
However, with the finance minister now hinting at the likelihood of missed performance targets, concerns about fiscal prudence are once again at the forefront of public discourse.
Analysts warn that failure to meet IMF criteria could have serious implications for Ghana’s economic recovery, particularly in securing future disbursements under the Fund’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) program.
Historically, Ghana has struggled to maintain fiscal discipline during election years, often resulting in significant budget deficits that take years to correct.
The current situation raises pertinent questions about whether policymakers have learned from past mistakes.
Despite repeated assurances from the previous administration officials about their commitment to prudent fiscal management, election-related spending appears to have once again strained the country’s economic framework.
Ghana may need to implement corrective measures to realign with IMF targets and ensure macroeconomic stability. This could mean further expenditure cuts, revenue-enhancing measures, or policy adjustments aimed at restoring fiscal discipline.
If the IMF confirms that key quantitative performance indicators were indeed missed, it could undermine investor confidence and complicate efforts to stabilize the economy.
More broadly, Appiah’s remarks underscores the urnet need for Ghana to prioritize long-term economic planning over short-term political expediency.
READ ALSO: Dr. Amin Adam Refutes Allegations of Misusing Tax Revenue
